Posted 12 October 2011 - 22:41
cekaj, a vas su popisali iako ne zivite tamo? a ja taman procitah iznad da se to ne radi?!
Posted 12 October 2011 - 22:46
Posted 13 October 2011 - 09:11
Jos jedna osmisljena manipulacija ovim popisom je umanjivanje stvarnog broja nezaposlenih:
Na pitanje "Da li ste u nedelji koja je predhodila popisu (24-30 septembar) barem jedan sat obavljali bilo kakav plaćeni posao?" 40 000 popisivaca je obuceno da odgovori sa DA.
Employment 9. (1) The "employed" comprise all persons above a specified age who during a specified brief period, either one week or one day, were in the following categories: (a) "paid employment": (a1) "at work": persons who during the reference period performed some work for wage or salary, in cash or in kind; (a2) "with a job but not at work": persons who, having already worked in their present job, were temporarily not at work during the reference period and had a formal attachment to their job. This formal job attachment should be determined in the light of national circumstances, according to one or more of the following criteria: (i) the continued receipt of wage or salary; (ii) an assurance of return to work following the end of the contingency, or an agreement as to the date of return; (iii) the elapsed duration of absence from the job which, wherever relevant, may be that duration for which workers can receive compensation benefits without obligations to accept other jobs; (b) "self-employment": (b1) "at work": persons who during the reference period performed some work for profit or family gain, in cash or in kind; (b2) "with an enterprise but not at work": persons with an enterprise, which may be a business enterprise, a farm or a service undertaking, who were temporarily not at work during the reference period for any specific reason. (2) For operational purposes, the notion of "some work" may be interpreted as work for at least one hour. (3) Persons temporarily not at work because of illness or injury, holiday or vacation, strike or lockout, educational or training leave, maternity or parental leave, reduction in economic activity, temporary disorganisation or suspension of work due to such reasons as bad weather, mechanical or electrical breakdown, or shortage of raw materials or fuels, or other temporary absence with or without leave should be considered as in paid employment provided they had a formal job attachment. (4) Employers, own account workers and members of producers’ co-operatives should be considered as in selfemployment and classified as “at work" or "not at work", as the case may be. (5) Unpaid family workers at work should be considered as in self-employment irrespective of the number of hours worked during the reference period. Countries which prefer for special reasons to set a minimum time criterion for the inclusion of unpaid family workers among the employed should identify and separately classify those who worked less than the prescribed time. (6) Persons engaged in the production of economic goods and services for own and household consumption should be considered as in self-employment if such production comprises an important contribution to the total consumption of the household. (7) Apprentices who received pay in cash or in kind should be considered in paid employment and classified as "at work" or "not at work" on the same basis as other persons in paid employment. (8) Students, homemakers and others mainly engaged in non-economic activities during the reference period, who at the same time were in paid employment or self-employment as defined in subparagraph (1) above should be considered as employed on the same basis as other categories of employed persons and be identified separately, where possible. (9) Members of the armed forces should be included among persons in paid employment. The armed forces should include both the regular and the temporary members as specified in the most recent revision of the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO).
Posted 13 October 2011 - 13:09
Posted 13 October 2011 - 14:14
I tako je zaposlenost u Srbiji skocila za 40.000 radnih mesta iz operativnih razloga.
Posted 13 October 2011 - 20:29
Si vid'o?! Ko bi rekao da su srBovi tako uticajni u ILO...
Posted 15 October 2011 - 04:17
Nikakvih problema nisam imao prilikom izjasnjavanja kao ateista, kao i uostalom ni desetak drugih za koje znam da su se tako izjasnili.
Veoma je zanimljivo kako su jedini na ovom forumu, koji su imali problema, upravo oni koji su i pre pocetka popisa, trubili kako ce biti neregularno, namesteno ..
Da ih ne znam, pomislio bih da su izmislili te probleme
Posted 15 October 2011 - 10:53
Posted 15 October 2011 - 11:12
Edited by st.maurice, 15 October 2011 - 11:13.
Posted 15 October 2011 - 11:56
Ovaj forum je pun nadobudnih jajara, koji nista drugo u svom zivotu nisu postigli osim da pljuju i blate sve sto ima veze sa Srbijom, ponekad posumnjam da par hostaplera za to dobija novac.Godinama pratim ovaj forum i zakljucio sam da par drustvenih parazita paradira ovde i jebe sve redom.A budes li im se slucajno suprotstavio - gotov si, ne gine ti ban pre ili kasnije.Vojska jebanih Srbofobicara marsira po forumu sve u sesnaest od punih deset godina.
Pa gori ste od svih SrBskih politicara...
Posted 15 October 2011 - 14:45
Strani Placenici i Hoksštapleri,pa naravno da vas lazu,sta ste ocekivali da ce govoriti istinu o nasem bezgresnom popisu?Sve je to smisljeno da bi se narusio nas teritorijalni integritet i suverenitet,a ko se suprodstavi najebao gi je!Spasavaj se ko moze!
Posted 16 October 2011 - 20:43
Posted 17 October 2011 - 03:52
Da, nas su popisali - rekli su svi koji su prijavljeni na toj adresi ali za nas nije moralo dosta pitanja jer smo duze napolju, u stvari moji su ostali sa utiskom da su pitanja bila vise za izbeglice nego emigrante, ili to zavisi kako je popisivac shvatio uputstvo...
Ali posto sam ja ocekivala to - ja sam instrukcije dala unapred
