Opet robot pita nesto sto je (doduse, za one koji su u stanju da percipiraju i procesiraju ljudski jezik) vec eksplicitno adresirano, jos u mojoj drugoj replici na ovoj temi, koji se moze naci caaaak - na prethodnoj stranici!!! (bohumilo, on 03 Feb 2017 - 16:10)
evo i dva linka (takodje, naravno, za ljude koji znaju da citaju i mogu da razumeju) o tome dogadjaju:
The Depression You've Never Heard Of: 1920-1921
https://fee.org/arti...d-of-1920-1921/
The Forgotten Depression of 1920
https://mises.org/li...depression-1920
Cela ekonomska istorija civilizacije se moze citati (i cita se, u mnogobrojnoj literaturi) u kljucu toga sta se desava kada vlasti manipulisu novcem, a sta kada vrednost i cenu novca i kredita odredjuje realna ekonomska konjunktura - od nakazne inflatorne politike poznorimskih careva koja je u dobroj meri zasluzna za propast Rima (iz tog fascinantnog perioda bi se dalo mnooogo nauciti), sve do istorije kapitalizma iz IXX, XX i XXI veka.
U daljem cu, iz ociglednih i jasno naznacenih razloga, ignorisati tvoje postove (barem dok ne prilozis rezultate sa onog testa sto sam predlozio) na ovoj temi, no necu te stavljati ignore listu, jer ne mislim da si intelektualno neposten (takve stavljam tamo), nego, naprosto, isuvise skroman za ovo...
Traljav primer i posipanje poluistinama - a poluistina je daleko opasnija od ogoljene lazi.
Prvo, kamatne stope ( kao i citavu monetarnu politiku) ne odredjuje slobodno trziste, vec centralne banke (ili bilo koji drugi entitet koji se bavi emisijom novca) - hoces li reci da i emisija novca treba biti prepustena slobodnom trzistu ("free market")?!??! Nikada nije bilo niti ce biti.
Znaci - kao prvo , i to podizanje kamatnih stopa je doslo intervencijom FED -a , a ne nekog "nevidljivog entiteta".
Drugo, na izlazak iz krize su uticale i neke druge mere a ne samo kamatne stope , evo malo vise o tome:
https://en.wikipedia..._Tariff_of_1921
https://en.wikipedia...McCumber_Tariff
A osim toga, uraddjeno je i sledece:
" ...To restore fiscal and price sanity, the authorities implemented what today strikes us as incredibly “merciless” policies. From FY 1919 to 1920, federal spending was slashed from $18.5 billion to $6.4 billion—a 65 percent reduction in one year. The budget was pushed down the next two years as well, to $3.3 billion in FY 1922."
Takodje i " ...Tax rates were slashed for all income groups. .."
Ima i kontroverzi u vezi sa "Depression of 1920-1921" :
" According to a 1989 analysis by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz, the recession of 1920–21 was the result of an unnecessary contractionary monetary policy by the Federal Reserve Bank. Paul Krugman agrees that high interest rates due to the Fed's effort to fight inflation caused the problem. This did not cause a deficiency in aggregate demand but in aggregate supply. Once the Fed relaxed its monetary policy, the economy rapidly recovered.
Takodje :
"In a 2011 article, Daniel Kuehn, a proponent of Keynesian economics, questions many of the assertions Woods makes about the 1920–21 recession. Kuehn notes the following:
- the most substantial downsizing of government was attributable to the Wilson administration, and occurred well before the onset of the 1920–21 recession.
- the Harding administration raised revenues in 1921 by expanding the tax base considerably at the same time that it lowered rates.
- Woods underemphasizes the role the monetary stimulus played in reviving the depressed economy and that, since the 1920–21 recession was not characterized by a deficiency in aggregate demand, fiscal stimulus was unwarranted...."
Edited by darth bane, 13 August 2018 - 01:21.