730 replies to this topic

[nlavrnja]

WTF once again

 

Grupa A:

 

1. Djokovic
2. Wawrinka
3. Berdih
4. Cilic

 

Grupa B:

 

1. Federer
2. Nisikori
3. Marej
4. Raonic

 

http://www.barclaysa...urfinals.com/en

 

[Oi!]

Dobra grupa za Novaka, mislim da dobija sve 3. 

[ciao]

I meni izgleda dobra grupa mada ovo je svezija grupa, ovu drugu je Nole dobio skoro celu kolko prosle nedelje

[jevrem69]

Odlicna grupa da pokusa da dobije sva tri meca .......... i da stvati tacku na ovu godinu.

[Cukuru Tazaki]

Siguran sam da će tačku staviti u finalu

[wwww]

 

Mike Dickson @Mike_Dickson_DM  · 

Sunday's order of play at O2 Arena: Murray v Nishikori afternoon session, Federer vs Raonic in the evening.

 

 

[Kido from Junkovac]

Da se prisetimo:

155.000 $ za ucesce svakom igracu. 85.000 $ za Ferera i verovatno pola od toga za Lopeza, koji je druga zamena.

 

Pobeda u grupi 200 bodova (155.000 $)

Pobeda u polufinalu 400 bodova (475.000 $)

PObeda u finalu 500 bodova (980.000 $)

 

[Undefeated champion: 1500 bodova, 2.075.000 $)

 

Za dubl, otprilike 5 x manje novca.

+

 

Semi-final Qualifying Procedure

a) Greatest number of wins;
b) Greatest number of matches played;
    Comment: 2-1 won-loss record beats a 2-0 won-loss record; a 1-2 record beats a 1-0 record.
c) Head-to-head results if only two (2) players are tied,
d) If three (3) players are tied, then:

Spoiler

1. If three (3) players each have one (1) win, a player having played less than all three (3) matches is automatically eliminated and the player advancing to the single elimination competition is the winner of the match-up of the two (2) players tied with 1-2 records; or
2. Highest percentage of sets won; or
3. Highest percentage of games won; or
4. The player positions on the Emirates ATP Rankings as of the Monday after the last ATP World Tour tournament of the calendar year.
5. If (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) produce one (1) superior player (first place), or one (1) inferior player (third place), and the two (2) remaining players are tied, the tie between those two (2) players shall be broken by head-to-head record.

Comment 1: 1 player has 3 wins and the other 3 players have 1 win. Of the 3 players with 1 win, 1 player has only played in 2 matches while the other 2 players have played 3 matches. The player who has only played 2 matches is eliminated and then the 2 remaining players revert back to head-to-head results with the winner of their match advancing to the semi-finals.

Comment 2: 1 player has 3 wins and the other 3 players have 1 win and they all have played 3 matches.
The tie-break for % of sets won has 1 player with a better % than the other two. This player advances to the semi-final round.

Comment 3: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, they are ordered by their % of sets won. This produces a 1, 2 & 3 order and the players finishing 1 and 2 move to the semi-final round and the player finishing 3 in % of sets won is eliminated. The player with the best % of sets won is the winner of the group.

Comment 4: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, 1 player’s sets won-loss is 5-2 for 71.43%; the other 2 players both have a 4-3 record in sets for 57.14%. In this case there is 1 superior player (71.43%) and the remaining 2 players are tied; it now reverts to the head to head result of the 2 remaining players with the winning player advancing as group runner-up.

Comment 5: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, 2 have set won-loss records of 5-3 (62.5%) while the other player is 4-3 (57.14%). In this case we have 1 inferior player (57.14%) and he is eliminated. The remaining two players both advance to the semi-finals with the winner of their head-to-head match advancing as the group winner.

Comment 6: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, all have played 3 matches and all 3 have set won-loss records of 5-4 (55.56%). In this case we move to % of games won. The % of games won breaks down like this: 44-40 for 52.38%, 45-43 for 51.14% and 44-43 for 50.57%. This produces a 1, 2 and 3 order of the group and the number 1 player in % of games won is the group winner while the player finishing 2nd in % of games won advances to the semi-finals as the group runner-up. The player with the 3rd best % of games won is eliminated.

[William H. Bonney]

Siguran sam da će tačku staviti u finalu

... rekao bih da će sve biti poznato pre finala. Osim toga ko diže pehar, naravno.

[Oi!]

... rekao bih da će sve biti poznato pre finala. Osim toga ko diže pehar, naravno.

 

Slažem se sa ovom konstatacijom. 

 

Lepo sam pisao ranije da je Novak osigurao to 80-20 %. 

[alcesta]

Nisam znala da ima i varijanta da o prolasku odlučuje i mesto na listi (naravno praktično je neverovatno da su dvojica toliko izjednačeni da dotle dođe). Je li se to ikad desilo?

Ne bi me čudilo da se Čilić ili Vavrinka povampire odjednom, ali u suštini Novak ako se ne opusti prerano ne bi trebalo da im dozvoli nikakvo iznenađenje. U ponedeljak verovatno nijedan meč neću stići da vidim

Ziki i Nestor ako ukače jednu pobedu u ovoj formi biće dobro

[jevrem69]

Nisam znala da ima i varijanta da o prolasku odlučuje i mesto na listi (naravno praktično je neverovatno da su dvojica toliko izjednačeni da dotle dođe). Je li se to ikad desilo?

Ne bi me čudilo da se Čilić ili Vavrinka povampire odjednom, ali u suštini Novak ako se ne opusti prerano ne bi trebalo da im dozvoli nikakvo iznenađenje. U ponedeljak verovatno nijedan meč neću stići da vidim

Ziki i Nestor ako ukače jednu pobedu u ovoj formi biće dobro

Ziki i Nestor ce iz hira da osvoje turnir i da jos jednom pokazu svetu da najbolje igraju pred zavrsetak saradnje 

Cilic da se povampiri, malo su sanse za to, a od Vavrinke se svakako jos koji put moze desiti da zablista, kao sto je to bio slucaj u prvom delu prosle i vecem delu predprosle godine.

[wwww]

Ziki i Nestor ako ukače jednu pobedu u ovoj formi biće dobro

Oni ako se ne podzapaju na terenu bice dobro

 

Sto se tice Cilica, videcemo kako ce reagovati na povecu pauzu pred WTF. Nije bas jednostavno posle pauze odmah igrati protiv #1 svoj prvi mec.

Edited by wwww, 04 November 2014 - 18:38.

[alcesta]

Ne znam jesu li u gorim odnosima bili prošli put kad su ga osvojili, ali mislim ipak da je sad gore

[vanjabarsa]

@alcesta: posto ti pratis zikija i nestora, u cemu je problem medju njima. matori ljudi, oko ceka se oni ne slazu? !

Edited by vanjabarsa, 04 November 2014 - 19:06.

[Oi!]

Ne znam jesu li u gorim odnosima bili prošli put kad su ga osvojili, ali mislim ipak da je sad gore

 

Pokušava da nam kaže nešto više o njihovim odnosima već po koji put...