Koliko je doping prisutan u profesionalnom tenisu?
#46
Posted 09 May 2009 - 23:13
a kako sam citala, kokain izmedju ostalog daje lazni osecaj samopouzdanja, tako da je njemu taj beg od stvarnosti izgledao ka raj na zemlji u poredjenju sa sve vecim srozavanjem na terenu i listi..
#47
Posted 09 May 2009 - 23:26
verovatno si u pravu...Moram da priznam da me ne iznenadjuje. ne mislim pritom da decko izgleda kao narkoman, nego je to vrlo cesto put onih koji razocaraju sebe i druge.
a kako sam citala, kokain izmedju ostalog daje lazni osecaj samopouzdanja, tako da je njemu taj beg od stvarnosti izgledao ka raj na zemlji u poredjenju sa sve vecim srozavanjem na terenu i listi..
Edited by M.S.25., 09 May 2009 - 23:27.
#48
Posted 10 May 2009 - 17:24
Rišar Gaske pozitivan na kokain
Autor: Tanjug | Foto:AFP | 09.05.2009. - 22:08
Francuski teniser Rišar Gaske bio je pozitivan na kokain na testiranju uoči turnira u martu u Majamiju, objavili su danas francuski mediji.
Ukoliko i drugi uzorak sa antidoping kontrole bude "pozitivan", 23. teniseru sveta preti dvogodišnja suspenzija.
Pre Gaskea, pozitivna na kokain bila je početkom prošle godine i bivša najbolja teniserka sveta Švajcarkinja Martina Hingis.
Njoj je tada izrečena dvogodišnja zabrana takmičenja, a nedugo posle toga Hingis je objavila završetak karijere.
Blic
Shta ce jadan...
Miami, manekenke, zhuraje...
Kome je josh do jurenja loptice na +30'C u hladu...
#49
Posted 11 May 2009 - 11:10
Autor: Blic online | Foto:AFP | 11.05.2009. - 10:26
Ovaj dvadesetdvogodišnjak, koji bi mogao da dobije dvogodišnju zabranu igranja, pao je narko-test na turniru u Majamiju u martu.
"Želim da objasnim svoje ponašanje kada bude bio pravi trenutak za to", rekao je.
Blic - ceo tekst
#50
Posted 12 May 2009 - 08:04
Edited by netizen_k, 12 May 2009 - 08:07.
#51
Posted 12 May 2009 - 09:47
Uporedite vesti o kokainu i u jednom i u drugom.
Gaske ponjupao sav kokain pa trziste kokaina odstupa
Attached Files
#52
Posted 15 July 2009 - 17:57
London, England, 15 Jul 2009 - The International Tennis Federation announced today that an independent Anti-Doping Tribunal convened under the 2009 Tennis Anti-Doping Programme has found that Richard Gasquet, a 23-year-old French tennis player, has committed a Doping Offence.
Following a two-day hearing in July 2009, an independent Anti-Doping Tribunal found that a sample provided by Mr Gasquet on 28 March 2009 at the ATP event in Miami, USA, had tested positive for benzoylecgonine, a metabolite of cocaine. Cocaine is a substance that is banned In-Competition under WADA’s 2009 List of Prohibited Substances, and is therefore also prohibited under the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme on the same basis.
The Tribunal rejected the suggestion made by Mr Gasquet that, by virtue of his withdrawal prior to playing a match in the Miami event, the sample provided by him on 28 March should be treated as having been collected Out-of-Competition. In that regard, it upheld the applicability, and the legality, of Article F.4 of the Programme, which provides that a player who withdraws from an event may be target-tested and that such test is to be treated as an In-Competition test, even if the player withdraws before playing a match. The Tribunal therefore found that Mr Gasquet had committed a Doping Offence under Article C.1 of the Programme (presence of a Prohibited Substance in player’s sample).
With regard to sanction, the Tribunal accepted Mr Gasquet’s plea of No Significant Fault or Negligence, on the basis that he was able to demonstrate on the balance of probabilities how the cocaine entered his system (through inadvertent contamination in a nightclub the night before his scheduled match), and that, while he was at fault in exposing himself to the risk of such contamination, that fault was not significant. It further ruled that, in the exceptional and “probably unique” circumstances of the case, it would be unjust and disproportionate to impose a 12-month sanction on Mr Gasquet. Instead it ruled that Mr Gasquet be suspended from participation for a period of two months and 15 days, commencing on 1 May 2009, and thus ending at 08:00 GMT on 15 July 2009. It also ruled that his results, ranking points and prize money from events subsequent to Miami should remain undisturbed.
The Tribunal’s written decision with reasons is available below. Any of those parties with the right of appeal may do so within three weeks from receipt of the written decision.
The Tennis Anti-Doping Programme is a comprehensive and internationally recognised anti-doping programme that applies to all players competing at tournaments sanctioned by the ITF, ATP and Sony Ericsson WTA Tour. Players are tested for substances prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency and upon a finding that a Doping Offence has been committed sanctions are imposed in accordance with the requirements of the World Anti-Doping Code. More background information on the Programme, sanctions, tennis statistics and related information can be found at www.itftennis.com/antidoping.
http://www.itftennis...articleid=20264
EDIT: Sad videh da je M. postovala istu vest na temi Izvan i iza turnira.
Edited by LidAl, 15 July 2009 - 18:01.
#53
Posted 15 July 2009 - 20:28
Da, ti si izabrao bolji topik.Sad videh da je M. postovala istu vest na temi Izvan i iza turnira.
Drago mi zbog ovoga, nadam se da je ova suspenzija bila dovoljna za razmišljanje.I to ne samo o kokainu.
Edited by M.S.25., 15 July 2009 - 20:30.
#54
Posted 16 July 2009 - 17:36
Ili da je bio toliko pijan da nije znao šta radi?
Edited by alcesta, 16 July 2009 - 17:38.
#55
Posted 16 July 2009 - 17:51
misliš da treba da razmisli i o drugim drogama koje je uzimao?Drago mi zbog ovoga, nadam se da je ova suspenzija bila dovoljna za razmišljanje.I to ne samo o kokainu.
koliko sam ja razumeo od čitavog slučaja bez da sam pročitao ijedan članak, richard se ljubio s devojkom koja je imala kokain u sistemu.
#56
Posted 16 July 2009 - 17:58
koliko sam ja razumeo od čitavog slučaja bez da sam pročitao ijedan članak, richard se ljubio s devojkom koja je imala kokain u sistemu.
#57
Posted 16 July 2009 - 19:57
#58
Posted 16 July 2009 - 20:02
#59
Posted 16 July 2009 - 20:36
Zašto, ako se u izveštaju kaže da je količina bila potpuno zanemarljiva?Teza sa poljupcem je ostvariva koliko i bezgrešno začeće...
Objektivno govoreći, teško da je to istina, kao što je i velika verovatnoća da bi teniser iz zemlje sa slabijim teniskim savezom i tradicijom daleko teže prošao, ali bi opet bilo žalosno da Rišar dobije višegodišnji ban zbog droge koja sigurno nije uticala na njegove dobre rezultate, niti je u tom cilju uzeta, mislim da je to nesporno.
E, da, neki se pitaju i da li je uticaja na odluku imao njegov navodni ljubavnik, milioner...Možda je zato teza sa poljupcem teže ostvariva...
Edited by M.S.25., 16 July 2009 - 20:47.
#60
Posted 16 July 2009 - 20:46