Jump to content


Photo

Tema za razmisljanje


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
52 replies to this topic

#1 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 21 June 2002 - 04:59

Da se malo odmorimo od brcica, plavog skarta i slicnog oralnog sexa. Evo vam teme za duboko razmisljanje (zzzzzzzzz...):

by Douglas Adams:

"There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened."

Za slucaj da neko ne razume, evo i prevoda:

"Há uma teoria que indique que se sempre qualquer um descobrirem exatamente o que o universo é para e porque ele está aqui, ele desaparecerao e serao substituídos imediatamente por algo mesmo mais bizarre e inexplicable. Há uma outra teoria que indique que esta tem acontecido já."

[ Izmena poruke: Indy na dan 2002-06-21 06:00 ]

#2 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 21 June 2002 - 06:02

Life in the Universe
Stephen William Hawking

It is a matter of common experience, that things get more disordered and chaotic with time. This observation can be elevated to the status of a law, the so-called Second Law of Thermodynamics. This says that the total amount of disorder, or entropy, in the universe, always increases with time. However, the Law refers only to the total amount of disorder. The order in one body can increase, provided that the amount of disorder in its surroundings increases by a greater amount. This is what happens in a living being. One can define Life to be an ordered system that can sustain itself against the tendency to disorder, and can reproduce itself. That is, it can make similar, but independent, ordered systems. To do these things, the system must convert energy in some ordered form, like food, sunlight, or electric power, into disordered energy, in the form of heat. In this way, the system can satisfy the requirement that the total amount of disorder increases, while, at the same time, increasing the order in itself and its offspring. A living being usually has two elements: a set of instructions that tell the system how to sustain and reproduce itself, and a mechanism to carry out the instructions. In biology, these two parts are called genes and metabolism. But it is worth emphasising that there need be nothing biological about them. For example, a computer virus is a program that will make copies of itself in the memory of a computer, and will transfer itself to other computers. Thus it fits the definition of a living system, that I have given. Like a biological virus, it is a rather degenerate form, because it contains only instructions or genes, and doesn't have any metabolism of its own. Instead, it reprograms the metabolism of the host computer, or cell. Some people have questioned whether viruses should count as life, because they are parasites, and can not exist independently of their hosts. But then most forms of life, ourselves included, are parasites, in that they feed off and depend for their survival on other forms of life. I think computer viruses should count as life.* Maybe it says something about human nature, that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive.

Posted Image
* - How cute!

#3 sand

sand
  • Members
  • 176 posts

Posted 21 June 2002 - 11:48

cekaj da procitam knjigu pa onda
da diskutujemo

#4 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 21 June 2002 - 13:15

Dobro, meni se ne zuri.

Heidegger's Ultimate Question

Why is there anything rather than nothing?

(sledeci pasaz sa h2g2.com na ovu temu mi se jako dopada)

When the Question Can Hit You

It's as much an experience as a question. It occurs to some people in a really major way, to others fleetingly, to others not at all. It can hit you between the eyes, or it can occur to you quietly, like a muffled bell. It can occur to people in the darkness of depression and despair, when they no longer care if anything exists or not, or in moments of heartfelt joy, when you see things as if anew. It also often occurs in children*. There can be an initial experience of uncanniness, as if the floor had suddenly opened beneath you - but it's an experience of how things are.

* istina! iz prve ruke

_________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live.

[ Izmena poruke: Indy na dan 2002-06-21 14:30 ]

#5 anarchic!

anarchic!
  • Members
  • 253 posts

Posted 21 June 2002 - 16:36

ODGOVOR :

Davljenik, tjst temoubicid se i za brcic hvata.

#6 HornyHamster

HornyHamster
  • Members
  • 92 posts

Posted 28 June 2002 - 23:55

hahahaha,treniranje i visoka kondicija mozga se nastavlja (LJUDI PA BOLJI STE OD ShAHA)
,drago mi je shto ima pametnih
ljudi ,koji i dalje zele da budu progresivni i inventivni i onda se sete da su i
ljudi paraziti koji se samo premestaju na mesta sa vise resursa (MATRIX-Smith, agent Smith)
kad iscrpu dotadasnje... pitanje ZA RECENZENTA I KRITICARA ANARCHIC-a:
MISLITE LI DA TU NEMA NIKAKVE VEZE SA ORALNIM SEXOM I DALJE ???
I DA LI POSTOJI 'KRUG' U ZIVOTU KOJI SE ZATVARA I NIKAD VISE NE PONAVLJA ???
:grin: :grin: :grin: :grin: :grin:
-------------------------------------------
RETRO RETRO RETRO . . . SAMO JE 'SKOLJKA' DRUGACIJA...

#7 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 00:38

Horny, suvise gledas pornice (Matrix, etc.) :grin:

#8 Malecka

Malecka
  • Members
  • 145 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 15:13

To Indy:
Cekamo da nam izraste jos jedna glava i da nas ljubazno usluzi kravica, a onda cemo biti sigurni da je kraj na pocetku..:grin:

Sa ili bez peskira?

#9 HornyHamster

HornyHamster
  • Members
  • 92 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 15:50

reply to Indy:
za razliku od tebe koji gledash samo horror-akcione-SF such as: Flashpoint,black men in black,satyr,blonde and beyond ...etc
:razz: :razz:

#10 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 15:51

Jel'ste se vi to dogovorili da mi minirate moju dubokomisaonu tjemu?!

:smile:

#11 HornyHamster

HornyHamster
  • Members
  • 92 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 16:02

njenjenjenje,mji sje njismo djogovorili dja mjiniramo tvjoju djubokoumnu temu :razz: :razz: :razz:

#12 Malecka

Malecka
  • Members
  • 145 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 17:07

A sto ja miniram? Uopce ne, samo nastavljam u duhu "Vodica" :grin:...I, da, ne udruzujem se sa tamo nekim Pohotnim Glodarom, protivu obozavanog mi "kralja ar'eologije" (sa velikim "a":grin:

#13 HornyHamster

HornyHamster
  • Members
  • 92 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 17:20

Malecka:
Hrcak, bez uvrede, ali Dr.Indy je jedan, a vas ima kol'ko hoces...:grin:

------------------------
pa naravno da nas ima koliko `oces kad se brzo razmnozavamo, hehehe
a shto se tice INDY-a i njegove teme ISKRENO i bez karakteristicne mi pohotnosti mogu reci da je tema ql ,samo da su komentari na istu malo vise originalni tj.napisani iz glave a ne citati iz ove ili one knjige...toliko
:razz:

#14 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 17:26

HornyHamster:
samo da su komentari na istu malo vise originalni tj.napisani iz glave a ne citati iz ove ili one knjige

Komentari jesu originalni, premda mozda nisu originalno moji - a zasto bi to bilo bitno?
:smile:

#15 HornyHamster

HornyHamster
  • Members
  • 92 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 18:45

Indy:

Komentari jesu originalni, premda mozda nisu originalno moji - a zasto bi to bilo bitno?
:smile:

Kad kazem originalni ,mislim na to da nisu preuzeti od nekoga ili citirani iz neke knjige...
meni je to bitno ,jel gradis stav na osnovu toga shta je ko zapisao,pa ti se svidelo ili ne, ili na osnovu svojih predjasnjih iskustava ?
ili ajde svi da citiramo ,da pokazemo koliko smo nacitani?!?
:smile: