No replies to this topic

[Drosophilia]

Novi predlog postavke DSE-a.

Da li postoji neki očigledni razlog zbog kojeg ovaj predlog eksperimenta nebi funkcionirao na način kako sam to predvidio.

Hvala.

Anton
------------------------------------------------


We have run the DS for electrons, one by one releasing regime, and it is recorded where are the fringes with hits on the detection screen made by electrons, one by one, hitting the detection screen in the interference pattern.

Now we made the hole ( conditionally speaking ) on the detection screen somewhere inside some of the fringes with hits of the interference pattern. The hole is wider, bigger than collapsed electron, so when some collapsed electron would be eventually passing through the hole there is no diffraction. The detection plate is as thinner as possible. Closely behind that detection plate is another classic, full detection plate.

Just in front ( as closer as it is possible ) of the hole is the only laser beam pointed vertically. The purpose of that laser beam is to collapse an electron before that electron would eventually pass through the hole to hit the classic full detection screen which is behind. Frequency and intensity of that laser beam is chosen by criterion that photon from than beam would be able to collapse an electron, but at the same time that possible disturbance of that electron momentum by the effect of scattering would be as smaller as possible.

If this would work than we would have recorded two "points" of the momentum of that particular electron which passed ( collapsed ) through the hole. One "point" of that electron's momentum is the hole itself ( or more precisely just in front of the hole where the laser beam collapsed that electron, imprecise for the wavelength of the chosen laser beam) , and another point of that electron's momentum is where exactly that electron hit the full detection screen behind the hole, to be absorbed.

If we have recorded that electron passing through "point" one, and being absorbed at point two , would it be possible from that information to calculate the momentum with which that electron approached the first point, "the hole", even after we included into the calculation eventual effect of scattering or some other possible disturbance on the approaching momentum of that electron?

If this on the other hand would not work, that is, an electron would un-interfere so to speak, then that would be the same/similar result as The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser . But that possible outcome of this proposal would be, seems to me, even more intriguing result then the result of the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser because in this case there is no entanglement but just one electron "predicting" the future, predicting " the hole", the laser beam and the full detection screen behind the first detection screen.