Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Fragments


  • Please log in to reply
1205 replies to this topic

#61 Ulis

Ulis
  • Members
  • 2,254 posts

Posted 09 March 2006 - 19:49


  • 0

#62 Ulis

Ulis
  • Members
  • 2,254 posts

Posted 09 March 2006 - 21:05


  • 0

#63 Rostokovsky

Rostokovsky
  • Members
  • 3,260 posts

Posted 10 March 2006 - 02:15




  • 0

#64 toal

toal
  • Members
  • 662 posts

Posted 10 March 2006 - 04:26


  • 0

#65 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 10 March 2006 - 04:34




Andy Warhol. Two Elvis. 1963.
  • 0

#66 Ulis

Ulis
  • Members
  • 2,254 posts

Posted 10 March 2006 - 10:39




  • 0

#67 Allegra

Allegra
  • Members
  • 1,957 posts

Posted 12 March 2006 - 01:11

Odjekivanje - Vasko Popa

Prazna soba stane da rezi
Uvucem se u svoju kozu

Tavanica stane da skici
Hitnem joj jednu kost
Uglovi stanu da kevcu
I njima hitnem po jednu kost
Pod stane da zavija
hitnem i njemu jednu kost

Jedan zid stane da laje
I njemu hitnem jednu kost
I drugi i treci i cetvrti zid
Stane da laje
Hitnem svakom po jednu kost

Prazna soba stane da urla
I sam prazan
Bez ijedne kosti
U stostruki se odjek
Urlika pretvaram

I odjekujem odjekujem
Odjekujem
  • 0

#68 Rostokovsky

Rostokovsky
  • Members
  • 3,260 posts

Posted 12 March 2006 - 01:18


  • 0

#69 juliana

juliana
  • Members
  • 1,408 posts

Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:16

QUOTE(Indy @ 10 Mar 2006, 04:34)

Andy Warhol. Two Elvis. 1963.


warholovi klonovi i ponavljanje, istost kao homoness of homosexuality
crimp, meyer & drugi zagovornici cultural studies [vs staromodna art history] smatraju da queer studies bacaju puno svetlo na warhola, 'kakvog ga zasluzujemo'


QUOTE
..
Perhaps more instructive in this context is an article that preceded the publication of Pop Out, Richard Meyer's "Warhol's Clones"–more instructive because Meyer's essay, like Foster's, attempts to reconcile the simulacral with the referential views of Warhol by examining the effects of Warhol's use of repetition, though to very different ends. Where Foster is interested in the function of repetition to screen the real, understood as traumatic, Meyer argues that the function of repetition is to conjure the sex appeal of the same, or what Leo Bersani in another context calls the homoness of homosexuality. Nevertheless, both Foster's and Meyer's arguments hinge on the intrusion of difference within repetition. Foster refers, for example, to what he calls "pops, such as a slipping of register or a washing of color,"40 while Meyer writes of a "model of duplication that can accommodate difference, whether generated through idiosyncracies of silkscreen registration, variegations of color, or the unpredictability of compositional format."41 Referring to the ways in which Warhol's "pops" produce both distance and nearness in the disaster pictures, Foster notes parenthetically, "Sometimes the coloring of the images has this strange double effect as well."42 With regard to a different series of works, Meyer writes, "Warhol applies garish colors to [Elvis] Presley's otherwise manly outfit such that his cowboy shirt becomes a scarlet blouse, his jeans lavender hot pants, his lips lusciously painted pink, his face pancake white. The publicity still's intended identification of Elvis as a gunslinger has been shifted into the royal register of the drag queen."

  • 0

#70 juliana

juliana
  • Members
  • 1,408 posts

Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:31



gardnerov luis pejn
[on je mrtav i umrece ]
  • 0

#71 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 12 March 2006 - 02:40

70's Audio


  • 0

#72 Ulis

Ulis
  • Members
  • 2,254 posts

Posted 12 March 2006 - 10:58






  • 0

#73 Alexia

Alexia
  • Members
  • 1,114 posts

Posted 12 March 2006 - 13:51

"I don't know what you mean by 'glory'," Alice said.

Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't- till I tell you. I meant 'there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'"

"But 'glory' doesn't mean 'a nice knock-down argument'," Alice objected.

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean- neither more nor less."

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master- that's all."

Alice was too much puzzled to say anything; so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. "They've a temper some of them- particularly verbs: they're the proudest- adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs- however, I can manage the whole lot of them! Impenetrability! That's what I say!"

Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass, Ch. VI

  • 0

#74 Indy

Indy
  • Members
  • 21,392 posts

Posted 12 March 2006 - 14:08


















Anders Petersen - "Cafe Lehmitz", Schirmer & Mosel (1978)
  • 0

#75 Ulis

Ulis
  • Members
  • 2,254 posts

Posted 13 March 2006 - 22:08


  • 0